Practising consonant clusters with minimal pairs

I’m hoping to do a whole article on the tricky but important point of practising consonant clusters, but not sure I have enough ideas for 700 words on the topic yet. I have come up with two ways of using minimal pairs to practice spr, sl, tr etc though.

The first one is to use minimal pairs where the difference is a sound added into the middle of the consonant cluster, e.g. spine/ supine. Some other examples with s + vowel + consonant/ s + consonant are given below.

The other (sneakier) way is to do another pronunciation point, e.g. sin/ seen, through minimal pairs and make sure some of the words you use have consonant clusters in them, e.g. skim/ scheme. After sorting out the minimal pairs pronunciation differences, you can then do a little practice on consonant clusters. Other examples for ship/ sheep with consonant clusters given at the bottom.

I have actually tried these yet, so feedback and other ideas on consonant clusters gratefully accepted.

Minimal pairs for s + consonant(s)

succumb/ scum

sullied/ slid

sullies / sleaze

sumac/ smack

supine/ spine

supple/ spool

support/ sport

supported/ sported

supporting/ sporting

supportive/ sportive

Nearly minimal pairs with s + consonant(s)

sap/ spa

sapped/ spat

sapper/ spur

sappier/ spear

sepia/ spear

septum/ sputum

serpent/ spent

sopor/ spoor

sopped/ spot

soppier/ spear

usurp/ asp

super/ spur

i/ i: minimal pairs with consonant clusters in them

bl

blip/ bleep

br

britches/ breeches

cr

crick/ creek

fl

flit/ fleet

gr

grid/ greed

grin/ green

grist/ greased

nd

finned/ fiend

sk

skid/ skied

skim/ scheme

skit/ skeet

sl

slick/ sleek

slip/ sleep

slit/ sleet

st

cist/ ceased

fist/ feast

still/ steal steel

This entry was posted in consonant clusters, minimal pairs. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Practising consonant clusters with minimal pairs

  1. Tyson Seburn (@seburnt)'s avatar Tyson Seburn (@seburnt) says:

    Hi there =)

    I really support your intent here. With some speakers, consonant clusters do really make a syllabic difference in their pronunciation. The one thing that bothers me a little with some of them is their words’ frequencies. It may be a culturally relative issue, but if students (or me, for example) aren’t likely to ever say the words (e.g. sopor/ spoor), I’d rather use contrasting pairs that they will–definitely a difficult task for teachers to come up with; they really need collecting over time.

    If nothing else, my argument here can be fodder for your article. ;)

    Cheers,
    Tyson

    Like

  2. Alex Case's avatar Alex Case says:

    Hi Tyson

    Absolutely agree, which is why I started doing my lists of minimal pairs by level:

    http://www.englishclub.com/pronunciation/minimal-pairs.htm

    Unfortunately, that was all the ones I could find for sp, despite spending quite a lot of time looking, so I included the lot plus not quite minimal pairs. One possible solution in my next post.

    Like

  3. Glen's avatar Glen says:

    Thanks a lot for this. Am doing a workshop with local Myanmar teachers and intrusive schwa sound are a problem. Was looking for some examples and these were really useful. Thanks again. Glen

    Like

  4. Glen's avatar Glen says:

    Here are some more –
    string – stirring
    please – police
    caress – cress

    Like

Comments are closed.