Quite apart from whatever risk there might be of teachers being trapped there if things really blow up (as very nearly happened in Libya), there must be some point at which the positive impact organisations can make by leaving as a protest would be more than the impact of staying. Or should cultural organisations absolutely never take decisions based on politics? If not absolutely never, where should the line in the sand be drawn?
Search
Subscribe (via email)
Categories
Tag cloud
- advanced
- anecdotes
- beginners
- classroom language
- confidence
- contractions
- Creativity
- Drilling
- elicitation
- ELT jargon
- formal and informal
- gossip
- GTKY
- guest writers
- History
- History of TEFL blogs
- Home lessons
- Interviews
- Lists
- Living abroad
- Metaphors
- Motivation
- News
- NNESTs
- One to one classes
- Personalisation
- Professionalism
- questionnaires
- random tefl ideas
- revision
- Student feedback
- teacher talk
- Teacher talking time
- Teaching low levels
- TEFL humour
- TEFL marketing
- TEFL quotes
- TEFL recruiters
- TEFL stats
- TEFLtastic classics
- TEFL volunteer
- Time management
- trivia
- Youtube
Top Posts & Pages
- Passive voice games, worksheets and poem
- Second, third and mixed conditionals discussion questions
- Third conditional games/ worksheets
- Don't do the CELTA
- Past Perfect games/ worksheets
- There is/ There are games, worksheets and songs
- Business English present tenses games/ worksheets
- Negotiating games/ worksheets for EFL learners
- Travel and tourism games/ worksheets
- C2 Proficiency games, worksheets and e-book
Recent Comments
Blogroll: Active TEFL blogs
Blogroll: Less active TEFL blogs
- teflgeek
- A CLIL to Climb
- The Steve Brown Blog
- ELT Diary
- Candy's Stripe
- Escocesa in Madrid
- Richmond Share blog
- A Hive of Activities
- Kovacs Gabi's Teaching Blog
- The Business English Experience
- Close Up
- What Ed Said
- Jeremy Harmer
- Olya Sergeeva's ELT Blog
- Christina Jones ELT Blog
- Kamila of Prague
- What do you think you're doing?
- Allison Lewis
- Beyond Language Learning
- How I See It Now
- Views from the Whiteboard
- Toward Proficiency
- Sponge ELT
You raise an interesting point.
I don’t think we can say that cultural organisations should never take political decisions, everything is political at the end of the day.
Personally, I think they should stay for as long as they think they are doing some good for the people of Syria. That has to be a decision taken by the people on the ground.
I am not sure, though, if the British Council is merely a cultural organisation. They seem to want to portray themselves as such, but lots of people would disagree.
Well, I think it’s up to the United Nations to decide whether the International House and the British Council should stay or leave. If it is a matter of physical health being jeopardised, then,I believe they (UN) will proceed to terminate /cease temprorarlily the operation of these cultural organisations.
But, deep down, I reckon the war conflicts in Syria are already fabricated, for the simple reason that some sort of political conspiracies are under way…
as stephen mentions certainly BC (no idea about IH) is an extension of the British gov., they perform the promotion of the ideology of their funders.
as to the staff involved they probably will be evacuated soon seeing as the US/UK seem bent on a military escalation.
if all parties were acting in good faith there would be no problem for staff to be able to stay there unfortunately that is not the case.